Fort v. Reid Ice Cream Co.
119 A. 638, 98 N.J.L. 559, 1923 N.J. LEXIS 250
Opinion
The judgment under review herein should be affirmed, for the reasons expressed in the opinion of the Supreme Court.
For affirmance — The Chancellor, Swayze, Trenchard, Bergen, Minturn, Black, Katzenbach, White, Heppenheimer, Williams, Gardner, Ackerson, Van Buskirk, JJ. 13.
For reversal — None.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Fort v. Reid Ice Cream Co., 119 A. 638, 98 N.J.L. 559, 1923 N.J. LEXIS 250 (N.J. 1923).
119 A. 638 (Fort v. Reid Ice Cream Co.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Bergquist v. Penterman
134 A.2d 20 (New Jersey Superior Court App Division, 1957)
Corrao v. West Jersey Corp.
80 A.2d 439 (New Jersey Superior Court App Division, 1951)
Marx v. Standard Oil Co. of New Jersey
69 A.2d 748 (New Jersey Superior Court App Division, 1949)
Girard v. Kabatznick
24 A.2d 257 (Supreme Court of Connecticut, 1942)
Cleary v. City of Camden
192 A. 29 (Supreme Court of New Jersey, 1937)
Werebeychick v. Morris Land Development Co., Inc.
142 A. 739 (Supreme Court of Connecticut, 1928)