Fort v. Reid Ice Cream Co.
119 A. 638, 98 N.J.L. 559, 1923 N.J. LEXIS 250
This text of 119 A. 638 (Fort v. Reid Ice Cream Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of New Jersey primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Fort v. Reid Ice Cream Co., 119 A. 638, 98 N.J.L. 559, 1923 N.J. LEXIS 250 (N.J. 1923).
Opinion
The judgment under review herein should be affirmed, for the reasons expressed in the opinion of the Supreme Court.
For affirmance — The Chancellor, Swayze, Trenchard, Bergen, Minturn, Black, Katzenbach, White, Heppenheimer, Williams, Gardner, Ackerson, Van Buskirk, JJ. 13.
For reversal — None.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Bergquist v. Penterman
134 A.2d 20 (New Jersey Superior Court App Division, 1957)
Corrao v. West Jersey Corp.
80 A.2d 439 (New Jersey Superior Court App Division, 1951)
Marx v. Standard Oil Co. of New Jersey
69 A.2d 748 (New Jersey Superior Court App Division, 1949)
Girard v. Kabatznick
24 A.2d 257 (Supreme Court of Connecticut, 1942)
Cleary v. City of Camden
192 A. 29 (Supreme Court of New Jersey, 1937)
Werebeychick v. Morris Land Development Co., Inc.
142 A. 739 (Supreme Court of Connecticut, 1928)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
119 A. 638, 98 N.J.L. 559, 1923 N.J. LEXIS 250, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/fort-v-reid-ice-cream-co-nj-1923.