Fort v. Fort

97 So. 2d 690
CourtSupreme Court of Florida
DecidedOctober 16, 1957
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 97 So. 2d 690 (Fort v. Fort) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Fort v. Fort, 97 So. 2d 690 (Fla. 1957).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Appellant seeks reversal of an order of the Chancellor with reference to support money to be paid to the appellee in a divorce proceeding.

The order under attack is affirmed but without prejudice to the appellant to reapply to the Chancellor for further modification of the alimony award as the exigencies of his situation might require, particularly with reference to the effect [691]*691of his physical disability resulting from injuries suffered in an automobile collision, as well as any other factors, adversely affecting appellant’s earning capacity, or showing appellee’s lack of need for support.

TERRELL, C. J., and HOBSON, ROBERTS, DREW, THORNAL and O’CONNELL, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Barsumian v. Barsumian
235 So. 2d 515 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1970)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
97 So. 2d 690, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/fort-v-fort-fla-1957.