Fort Pierce Schiffs, Inc. v. Keith Investments, Inc.

192 So. 2d 21, 1966 Fla. App. LEXIS 4576
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedNovember 21, 1966
DocketNo. 576
StatusPublished

This text of 192 So. 2d 21 (Fort Pierce Schiffs, Inc. v. Keith Investments, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Fort Pierce Schiffs, Inc. v. Keith Investments, Inc., 192 So. 2d 21, 1966 Fla. App. LEXIS 4576 (Fla. Ct. App. 1966).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Plaintiff, Fort Pierce Schiffs, Inc., appeals from a declaratory decree entered in favor of defendant, Keith Investments, Inc.

Plaintiff entered into a lease agreement with defendant and went into possession of the premises which constituted part of defendant’s shopping center. Plaintiff notified defendant that it intended to cancel the lease agreement based upon the provision in the lease providing that the shopping center would contain a building area [22]*22of not less than 200,000 square feet on or before October 1, 1964.

Plaintiff brought this proceeding under F.S.A. § 87.01 for a declaratory decree as to its rights under the lease.

The trial court heard the testimony of witnesses, examined'the exhibits, and carefully considered the issues raised. A careful examination of the record discloses no reversible error. Cohen v. Plymouth Cordage Company, Fla.App.1966, 188 So.2d 2.

Affirmed.

SMITH, C. J., and ANDREWS and WALDEN, TJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Cohen v. Plymouth Cordage Co.
188 So. 2d 2 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1966)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
192 So. 2d 21, 1966 Fla. App. LEXIS 4576, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/fort-pierce-schiffs-inc-v-keith-investments-inc-fladistctapp-1966.