Fort Pierce Growers Assn. v. Storey

29 So. 2d 205, 158 Fla. 192, 1946 Fla. LEXIS 544
Supreme Court of Florida·Decided January 13, 1946·Published·Cited by 3 cases

Opinions

*193 PER CURIAM:

Mr. Justice THOMAS has set forth the history of this case with a complete analysis of the questions for decision in his dissenting opinion. A majority of the court is of the opinion that sufficient legal evidence was adduced to show that Storey met his death under circumstances which would warrant relief.

When the electric storm arose Storey sought shelter under a tarpaulin provided by his employer. The tarpaulin was suspended between two trees which were higher than the surrounding growth which increased the hazard of injury by lightning. Once under the shelter he chanced to sit on a box of tools thereby subjecting himself to greater danger to lightning than to others in general.

We hold that the employee met his death by ah accident arising out of and in the course of his employment and the order appealed from is reversed with directions to enter an award for the claimant as provided by statute.

Reversed.

CHAPMAN, C. J., TERRELL, BUFORD, ADAMS and BARNS, JJ., concur. THOMAS, J., dissents.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Fort Pierce Growers Assn. v. Storey, 29 So. 2d 205, 158 Fla. 192, 1946 Fla. LEXIS 544 (Fla. 1946).

29 So. 2d 205 (Fort Pierce Growers Assn. v. Storey) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Pope v. Goodson
107 S.E.2d 524 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1959)
Lyng v. Rao
72 So. 2d 53 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1954)
McKiney v. Reynolds & Manley Lumber Co.
54 S.E.2d 471 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1949)