Fort Peck Tribes v. Walking Eagle

11 Am. Tribal Law 279
CourtFort Peck Appellate Court
DecidedJune 30, 2011
DocketNo. 570
StatusPublished

This text of 11 Am. Tribal Law 279 (Fort Peck Tribes v. Walking Eagle) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Fort Peck Appellate Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Fort Peck Tribes v. Walking Eagle, 11 Am. Tribal Law 279 (ftpeckctapp 2011).

Opinion

ORDER DISMISSING APPEAL

On May 13, 2011, Appellant Bernetta Walking Eagle filed a “Petition for Review” of the denial by the Tribal Trial Court of her Motion to Dismiss a criminal complaint against her. Appellee Fort Peck Tribes opposes review. The Tribes first argue that Appellant’s initiation of appellate review is improper since a Petition for Review is used exclusively in civil cases and a Notice of Appeal is the proper way to institute appeal of a criminal proceeding. Second, Appellant contends that the appeal should not be granted because the decision to deny a Motion to Dismiss is not final under the Fort Peck Tribes Comprehensive Code of Justice.

Regardless of the title of the document used to initiate appellate review, we treat this as a properly filed appellate proceeding. However, we agree that the decision of the Tribal Trial Court is not final within the meaning of Title II, Section 202.

Therefore, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that this appeal is dismissed and remanded to the Tribal Trial Court for further proceedings.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
11 Am. Tribal Law 279, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/fort-peck-tribes-v-walking-eagle-ftpeckctapp-2011.