Fort Peck Tribes v. Lambert

Fort Peck Appellate Court

Fort Peck Tribes v. Lambert

13 Am. Tribal Law 444

CourtFort Peck Appellate Court

DecidedNovember 18, 2016

DocketNo. AP 702

StatusPublished

This text of 13 Am. Tribal Law 444 (Fort Peck Tribes v. Lambert) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Fort Peck Appellate Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Fort Peck Tribes v. Lambert, 13 Am. Tribal Law 444 (ftpeckctapp 2016).

Pincite

Opinion

ORDER OF DENIAL

¶ 1 This matter came before the Fort Peck Appellate Court on a CONTINUING OBJECTION; MOTION FOR RECONSIDERATION; MOTION FOR SUSPENSION OF RULES; MOTION FOR CONTINUANCE AND POSTPONEMENT, filed October 19, 2015 by Lay Advocate Sharon Avery on behalf of Eileen Lambert. A review of this Court’s record reflects that no order has ever been issued by the Appellate Court in this matter. This Court can only entertain this type of motion when an order, decision or opinion has been issued by this Court. See Rule 9 of the Rules of Procedure in the Court of Appeals, Appendix 8 CCOJ.

¶ 2 Given Advocate Avery’s failure to file any appropriate notice of appeal, the lack of compliance with the applicable rules regarding a motion to reconsider and the lack of clarity regarding the purpose for the other motions filed, all of Defen-dani/Petitioner’s motions are hereby DENIED.

SO ORDER.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER OF DENIAL

¶ 1 This matter came before the Fort Peck Appellate Court on a CONTINUING OBJECTION; MOTION FOR RECONSIDERATION; MOTION FOR SUSPENSION OF RULES; MOTION FOR CONTINUANCE AND POSTPONEMENT, filed October 19, 2015 by Lay Advocate Sharon Avery on behalf of Eileen Lambert. A review of this Court’s record reflects that no order has ever been issued by the Appellate Court in this matter. This Court can only entertain this type of motion when an order, decision or opinion has been issued by this Court. See Rule 9 of the Rules of Procedure in the Court of Appeals, Appendix 8 CCOJ.

¶ 2 Given Advocate Avery’s failure to file any appropriate notice of appeal, the lack of compliance with the applicable rules regarding a motion to reconsider and the lack of clarity regarding the purpose for the other motions filed, all of Defen-dani/Petitioner’s motions are hereby DENIED.

SO ORDER.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

13 Am. Tribal Law 444, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/fort-peck-tribes-v-lambert-ftpeckctapp-2016.