Fort Myers Realty Co. v. Pool

151 So. 381, 113 Fla. 175, 1933 Fla. LEXIS 1705
Supreme Court of Florida·Decided December 6, 1933·Published·Cited by 3 cases

Opinion

Per Curiam.

This cause having heretofore been submitted to the Court upon the transcript of the record of the judgment herein, and briefs and argument of counsel for the respective parties, and the record having been seen and inspected, and the Court being now advised of its judgment to be given in the premises, it seems to the Court that there is no error in the said judgment; it is, therefore, considered, ordered and adjudged by the Court that the said judgment of the Circuit Court be, and the same is hereby affirmed.

*176 ■ Davis, C. J., and Whitfield, Ellis and Buford, J. J., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Fort Myers Realty Co. v. Pool, 151 So. 381, 113 Fla. 175, 1933 Fla. LEXIS 1705 (Fla. 1933).

151 So. 381 (Fort Myers Realty Co. v. Pool) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Rodriguez v. Travelers Ins. Co.
367 So. 2d 687 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1979)
New York Life Insurance v. Lecks
165 So. 50 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1935)