Fort Myers Airways, Inc. v. American States Insurance Co.

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Fort Myers Airways, Inc. v. American States Insurance Co.

420 So. 2d 662, 1982 Fla. App. LEXIS 21451

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedOctober 20, 1982

DocketNos. 81-2455, 82-16

StatusPublished

This text of 420 So. 2d 662 (Fort Myers Airways, Inc. v. American States Insurance Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Fort Myers Airways, Inc. v. American States Insurance Co., 420 So. 2d 662, 1982 Fla. App. LEXIS 21451 (Fla. Ct. App. 1982).

Pincite

Opinion

CAMPBELL, Judge.

These consolidated cases represent the second appeal arising from the January, 1977, crash of Herman Shaw’s Cessna 411 aircraft. In Fort Myers Airways, Inc. v. American States Insurance Co., 411 So.2d 883 (Fla. 2d DCA 1982), we held that Shaw’s flight instructor, Donald Varbonco-eur, was an insured under the policy written by American States for Shaw. We based our holding on the premise that “a flight instructor, giving instructions to the owner and insured of an airplane, is the agent or employee of the owner under an insurance policy which provides coverage to an agent or employee of the insured.” 411 So.2d at 884-85. Now, contending that it is also an agent or employee of the deceased, Fort Myers Airways, Inc. claims it should be treated as an insured under the American States’ policy. Prior to our decision in Fort Myers Airways, the trial court found that Fort Myers Airways is not an insured under this policy and entered summary judgment in favor of American States. This appeal followed.

In Fort Myers Airways, we concluded that Varboncoeur was an insured under the policy because Shaw’s direct control over Varboncoeur while they were airborne was sufficient to make Varboncoeur an agent or employee of Shaw for purposes of the insurance contract. That is not the case here, because the type and degree of control is not the same. Shaw had a contractual, business relationship with Fort Myers Airways that he could terminate at any time. But, he did not have the same degree of immediate control and direction over Fort Myers Airways that he had over Donald Varboncoeur. Therefore, for purposes of the insurance coverage provided by American States to Shaw and his agents or employees, Fort Myers Airways was not Shaw’s agent and entry of summary judgment in favor of American States was proper.

AFFIRMED.

BOARDMAN, A.C.J., and GRIMES, J., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

CAMPBELL, Judge.

These consolidated cases represent the second appeal arising from the January, 1977, crash of Herman Shaw’s Cessna 411 aircraft. In Fort Myers Airways, Inc. v. American States Insurance Co., 411 So.2d 883 (Fla. 2d DCA 1982), we held that Shaw’s flight instructor, Donald Varbonco-eur, was an insured under the policy written by American States for Shaw. We based our holding on the premise that “a flight instructor, giving instructions to the owner and insured of an airplane, is the agent or employee of the owner under an insurance policy which provides coverage to an agent or employee of the insured.” 411 So.2d at 884-85. Now, contending that it is also an agent or employee of the deceased, Fort Myers Airways, Inc. claims it should be treated as an insured under the American States’ policy. Prior to our decision in Fort Myers Airways, the trial court found that Fort Myers Airways is not an insured under this policy and entered summary judgment in favor of American States. This appeal followed.

In Fort Myers Airways, we concluded that Varboncoeur was an insured under the policy because Shaw’s direct control over Varboncoeur while they were airborne was sufficient to make Varboncoeur an agent or employee of Shaw for purposes of the insurance contract. That is not the case here, because the type and degree of control is not the same. Shaw had a contractual, business relationship with Fort Myers Airways that he could terminate at any time. But, he did not have the same degree of immediate control and direction over Fort Myers Airways that he had over Donald Varboncoeur. Therefore, for purposes of the insurance coverage provided by American States to Shaw and his agents or employees, Fort Myers Airways was not Shaw’s agent and entry of summary judgment in favor of American States was proper.

AFFIRMED.

BOARDMAN, A.C.J., and GRIMES, J., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

420 So. 2d 662, 1982 Fla. App. LEXIS 21451, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/fort-myers-airways-inc-v-american-states-insurance-co-fladistctapp-1982.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack