Fort Morgan Bean Co. v. Chicago, Burlington & Quincy Railroad
293 P. 526, 131 Kan. 679, 1930 Kan. LEXIS 383
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Fort Morgan Bean Co. v. Chicago, Burlington & Quincy Railroad. Read the opinion of the Court — 130 Kan. 859 →
Opinion
The opinion of the court was delivered by
An opinion in this case is found in Fort Morgan Bean Co. v. Chicago, B. & Q. Rld. Co., 130 Kan. 859, 287 Pac. 589. On the application of the defendant, a rehearing has been granted. It has been rebriefed and reargued. .
[680]*680After a careful reexamination of the .abstracts and briefs, the court has concluded that the opinion formerly written correctly stated the law applicable to the facts there disclosed. For that reason the court adheres to its former opinion.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Fort Morgan Bean Co. v. Chicago, Burlington & Quincy Railroad, 293 P. 526, 131 Kan. 679, 1930 Kan. LEXIS 383 (kan 1930).
293 P. 526 (Fort Morgan Bean Co. v. Chicago, Burlington & Quincy Railroad) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Fort Morgan Bean Co. v. Chicago, Burlington & Quincy Railroad
288 P. 589 (Supreme Court of Kansas, 1930)