Fort Lauderdale Food Not Bombs v. City of Fort Lauderdale

Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA FORT LAUDERDALE DIVISION

CASE NO. 15-60185-CIV-CANNON/Hunt FORT LAUDERDALE FOOD NOT BOMBS, NATHAN PIM, JILLIAN PIM, HAYLEE BECKER, and WILLIAM TOOLE,

Plaintiffs, v.

CITY OF FORT LAUDERDALE,

Defendant. ________________________________/ ORDER ACCEPTING MAGISTRATE JUDGE’S REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS

THIS CAUSE is before the Court upon the Report (“R&R”) of Magistrate Judge Patrick M. Hunt recommending that Plaintiffs’ Unopposed Motion for Bill of Costs [ECF No. 132] be granted [ECF No. 152]. On January 29, 2022, the Court referred the Bill of Costs to Magistrate Judge Patrick M. Hunt for a Report and Recommendation [ECF No. 133]. On June 8, 2022, Judge Hunt issued the instant R&R, recommending that the proposed taxable costs be granted [ECF No. 152]. The R&R states that the parties shall file any objections within fourteen days of the date of service of the R&R [ECF No. 152 p. 5]. No party has filed objections. The Court has conducted a de novo review of the R&R and the record in this case and is otherwise fully advised in the premises. See Williams v. McNeil, 557 F.3d 1287, 1291 (11th Cir. 2009) (citing 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)). Upon review, the Court finds the R&R to be correct. The Court therefore agrees with the analysis in the R&R and concludes that the Bill of Costs should be GRANTED for the reasons set forth therein. CASE NO. 15-60185-CIV-CANNON/Hunt

Accordingly, it is ORDERED and ADJUDGED as follows: 1. The R&R [ECF No. 152] is ACCEPTED. 2. Plaintiffs’ Motion for Bill of Costs [ECF No. 132] is GRANTED. 3. Plaintiffs shall recover $1,842.92 in taxable costs. DONE AND ORDERED in Chambers at Fort Pierce, Florida this 5th day of July 2022.

Z M. CANNON UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE ce: counsel of record