Fort James Operating Company v. Irby

895 So. 2d 298, 2004 Ala. Civ. App. LEXIS 594, 2004 WL 1699865
CourtCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama
DecidedJuly 30, 2004
Docket2020598
StatusPublished
Cited by3 cases

This text of 895 So. 2d 298 (Fort James Operating Company v. Irby) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Fort James Operating Company v. Irby, 895 So. 2d 298, 2004 Ala. Civ. App. LEXIS 594, 2004 WL 1699865 (Ala. Ct. App. 2004).

Opinion

[299]*299 After Remand from the Supreme Comt

THOMPSON, Judge.

The prior judgment of this court has been reversed and the cause remanded by the Supreme Court of Alabama. Ex parte Fort James Operating Company, 895 So.2d 294 (Ala.2004). On remand to this court, and in compliance with the Supreme Court’s opinion, the judgment of the trial court is hereby reversed insofar as it denied Fort James a setoff of the workers’ compensation benefits for the sickness- and-accident benefits Fort James paid to Irby and insofar as it awarded “other benefits” to Irby. The cause is remanded for further proceedings consistent with the Supreme Court’s opinion.

REVERSED AND REMANDED WITH INSTRUCTIONS.

YATES, P.J., and CRAWLEY, PITTMAN, and MURDOCK, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Norandal U.S.A., Inc. v. Graben
18 So. 3d 405 (Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama, 2009)
Boise Cascade Corp. v. Jackson
997 So. 2d 1026 (Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama, 2007)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
895 So. 2d 298, 2004 Ala. Civ. App. LEXIS 594, 2004 WL 1699865, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/fort-james-operating-company-v-irby-alacivapp-2004.