Fort James Operating Company v. Irby

895 So. 2d 298, 2004 Ala. Civ. App. LEXIS 594, 2004 WL 1699865
Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama·Decided July 30, 2004·No. 2020598·Published·Cited by 3 cases

Opinion

[299]*299 After Remand from the Supreme Comt

THOMPSON, Judge.

The prior judgment of this court has been reversed and the cause remanded by the Supreme Court of Alabama. Ex parte Fort James Operating Company, 895 So.2d 294 (Ala.2004). On remand to this court, and in compliance with the Supreme Court’s opinion, the judgment of the trial court is hereby reversed insofar as it denied Fort James a setoff of the workers’ compensation benefits for the sickness- and-accident benefits Fort James paid to Irby and insofar as it awarded “other benefits” to Irby. The cause is remanded for further proceedings consistent with the Supreme Court’s opinion.

REVERSED AND REMANDED WITH INSTRUCTIONS.

YATES, P.J., and CRAWLEY, PITTMAN, and MURDOCK, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Fort James Operating Company v. Irby, 895 So. 2d 298, 2004 Ala. Civ. App. LEXIS 594, 2004 WL 1699865 (Ala. Ct. App. 2004).

895 So. 2d 298 (Fort James Operating Company v. Irby) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Norandal U.S.A., Inc. v. Graben
18 So. 3d 405 (Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama, 2009)
Boise Cascade Corp. v. Jackson
997 So. 2d 1026 (Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama, 2007)