Fort Hamilton Manor, Inc. v. Boyland

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Fort Hamilton Manor, Inc. v. Boyland

1 A.D.2d 979, 151 N.Y.S.2d 928, 1956 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5638

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedApril 30, 1956

StatusPublished

This text of 1 A.D.2d 979 (Fort Hamilton Manor, Inc. v. Boyland) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Fort Hamilton Manor, Inc. v. Boyland, 1 A.D.2d 979, 151 N.Y.S.2d 928, 1956 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5638 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1956).

Pincite

Opinion

In proceedings to review assessments of real property consisting of land and improvements, for the tax year 1953-1954, the appeals are from orders dismissing the petitions and confirming the assessments. Title to the land was vested in the United States Government, which had leased the land to appellants for 75 years. Appellants, pursuant to the provisions' of the leases, erected apartment houses to provide housing for military and other personnel. Title to the improvements is vested in the lessees for the term of the leases. The Special Term found that Congress had consented that the property be taxed. Orders unanimously affirmed, without costs. No opinion. Present — Nolan, P. J., Beldock, Murphy, Hallinan and Kleinfeld, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In proceedings to review assessments of real property consisting of land and improvements, for the tax year 1953-1954, the appeals are from orders dismissing the petitions and confirming the assessments. Title to the land was vested in the United States Government, which had leased the land to appellants for 75 years. Appellants, pursuant to the provisions' of the leases, erected apartment houses to provide housing for military and other personnel. Title to the improvements is vested in the lessees for the term of the leases. The Special Term found that Congress had consented that the property be taxed. Orders unanimously affirmed, without costs. No opinion. Present — Nolan, P. J., Beldock, Murphy, Hallinan and Kleinfeld, JJ.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

1 A.D.2d 979, 151 N.Y.S.2d 928, 1956 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5638, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/fort-hamilton-manor-inc-v-boyland-nyappdiv-1956.