Fort Gary Flour Mills Co. v. Steamship Belgium Maru
This text of 63 F. Supp. 892 (Fort Gary Flour Mills Co. v. Steamship Belgium Maru) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court, S.D. New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
The exceptive allegations will be held proper to effectively dispose of the issues raised. I have given careful thought to the opinion of Foster, C. J., in The Scantic, 5 Cir., 40 F.2d 39, 1930 A.M.C. 899, but the reasoning in California-Atlantic Steamship Co. v. Central Door & Lumber Co., 9 Cir., 206 F. 5, and Judge Inch in El Oriente, D. C., 5 F.2d 251, is more persuasive.
Exceptions will be sustained and an order may be entered severing the action and dismissing the libel as against the Pennsylvania Railroad Company.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
63 F. Supp. 892, 1935 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 1005, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/fort-gary-flour-mills-co-v-steamship-belgium-maru-nysd-1935.