Forsythe v. Winans

44 Ohio St. (N.S.) 277
Ohio Supreme Court·Decided January 15, 1886·Published

Opinion

By the Court.

Where, under the provisions of section 1777 of the Revised Statutes, a solicitor of a municipal corporation briugs suit to enjoin the misappropriation of money by the council, he is not required to give an undertaking, and an injunction so allowed by a court of competent jurisdiction, or a judge thereof, operates without such undertaking being given ; and the members of council, or any of them, violating the injunction after notice thereof has been served upon them, are liable to be punished for the same as for a contempt of the authority of the court,

.Judgment affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Forsythe v. Winans, 44 Ohio St. (N.S.) 277 (Ohio 1886).

44 Ohio St. (N.S.) 277 (Forsythe v. Winans) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.