Forsyth Mfg. Co. v. Putnam, Hooker & Co.

139 F. 1007, 71 C.C.A. 684, 1905 U.S. App. LEXIS 3924
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
DecidedOctober 14, 1905
DocketNo. 1,440
StatusPublished

This text of 139 F. 1007 (Forsyth Mfg. Co. v. Putnam, Hooker & Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Forsyth Mfg. Co. v. Putnam, Hooker & Co., 139 F. 1007, 71 C.C.A. 684, 1905 U.S. App. LEXIS 3924 (5th Cir. 1905).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The record in this case fails to disclose such diverse citizenship as to confer jurisdiction upon the Circuit Court, and therefore, •on authority of Knight et al. v. Lutcher & Moore Lumber Company (C. C. A.) 136 Fed. 404, the judgment of the Circuit Court is reversed, with costs against the defendants in error, and the case is remanded to the Circuit Court, with instructions to proceed according to law and in conformity with our views as expressed in Knight et al. v. Lutcher & Moore Lumber Company, above referred to.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Knight v. Lutcher & Moore Lumber Co.
136 F. 404 (Fifth Circuit, 1905)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
139 F. 1007, 71 C.C.A. 684, 1905 U.S. App. LEXIS 3924, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/forsyth-mfg-co-v-putnam-hooker-co-ca5-1905.