Forsyth Memorial Hospital, Inc. v. Sebelius
652 F.3d 42, 397 U.S. App. D.C. 310, 2011 WL 3570007
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Forsyth Memorial Hospital, Inc. v. Sebelius. Read the opinion of the Court — 652 F.3d 42 →
Opinions
ORDER
Appellants’ petition for rehearing en banc and the response thereto were circulated to the full court, and a vote was requested. Thereafter, a majority of the judges eligible to participate did not vote in favor of the petition. Upon consideration of the foregoing, it is
ORDERED that the petition be denied.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Forsyth Memorial Hospital, Inc. v. Sebelius, 652 F.3d 42, 397 U.S. App. D.C. 310, 2011 WL 3570007 (D.C. Cir. 2011).
652 F.3d 42 (Forsyth Memorial Hospital, Inc. v. Sebelius) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Bowen v. Georgetown University Hospital
488 U.S. 204 (Supreme Court, 1988)
St. Luke's Hospital v. Sebelius
611 F.3d 900 (D.C. Circuit, 2010)
National Mining Ass'n v. Department of Labor
292 F.3d 849 (D.C. Circuit, 2002)
Consolidated Edison Co. of New York, Inc. v. Federal Energy Regulatory Commission
315 F.3d 316 (D.C. Circuit, 2003)
Qwest Services Corp. v. Federal Communications Commission
509 F.3d 531 (D.C. Circuit, 2007)
BNSF Railway Co. v. Surface Transportation Board
526 F.3d 770 (D.C. Circuit, 2008)
Forsyth Memorial Hospital, Inc. v. Sebelius
652 F.3d 42 (D.C. Circuit, 2011)
Health Insurance Ass'n of America, Inc. v. Shalala
23 F.3d 412 (D.C. Circuit, 1994)