Forster v. Malone

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Forster v. Malone

116 S.E. 560, 30 Ga. App. 75, 1923 Ga. App. LEXIS 256

CourtCourt of Appeals of Georgia

DecidedMarch 8, 1923

Docket14108

StatusPublished

This text of 116 S.E. 560 (Forster v. Malone) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Forster v. Malone, 116 S.E. 560, 30 Ga. App. 75, 1923 Ga. App. LEXIS 256 (Ga. Ct. App. 1923).

Pincite

Opinion

Luke, J.

There was evidence to authorize the verdict in this ease, and the verdict has the approval of the trial judge. The special grounds of the motion for a new trial which complain of the charge of the court are without merit. The charge of the court was full, fair, and properly adjusted to the pleadings and the evidence. Tor no reason assigned was it error to overrule the motion for a new trial.

Judgment affirmed.

Broyles, O. J., and Bloodixorth, J., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Luke, J.

There was evidence to authorize the verdict in this ease, and the verdict has the approval of the trial judge. The special grounds of the motion for a new trial which complain of the charge of the court are without merit. The charge of the court was full, fair, and properly adjusted to the pleadings and the evidence. Tor no reason assigned was it error to overrule the motion for a new trial.

Judgment affirmed.

Broyles, O. J., and Bloodixorth, J., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

116 S.E. 560, 30 Ga. App. 75, 1923 Ga. App. LEXIS 256, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/forster-v-malone-gactapp-1923.