Forster v. Durham

Supreme Court of Florida

Forster v. Durham

566 So. 2d 256, 15 Fla. L. Weekly Supp. 465, 1990 Fla. LEXIS 1141, 1990 WL 132924

CourtSupreme Court of Florida

DecidedSeptember 13, 1990

DocketNo. 75529

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 566 So. 2d 256 (Forster v. Durham) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Forster v. Durham, 566 So. 2d 256, 15 Fla. L. Weekly Supp. 465, 1990 Fla. LEXIS 1141, 1990 WL 132924 (Fla. 1990).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

We accepted review of Durham v. Palm Court, Inc., 558 So.2d 59 (Fla. 4th DCA 1990), based on express and direct conflict with First Florida Bank, N.A. v. Max Mitchell & Co., 541 So.2d 155 (Fla. 2d DCA 1989), quashed, 558 So.2d 9 (Fla.1990), and Gordon v. Etue, Wardlaw & Co., 511 So.2d 384 (Fla. 1st DCA 1987), disapproved, First Florida Bank, 558 So.2d at 16. We now find that the basis of conflict jurisdiction has been eliminated by our opinion in First Florida Bank. Moreover, we find the result reached by the district court below to be consistent with the analysis in First Florida Bank. Accordingly, this petition is dismissed for lack of conflict jurisdiction.

It is so ordered.

SHAW, C.J., and OVERTON, McDonald, ehrlich, barkett, GRIMES and KOGAN, JJ., concur. NO MOTION FOR REHEARING WILL BE ENTERTAINED BY THE COURT.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

We accepted review of Durham v. Palm Court, Inc., 558 So.2d 59 (Fla. 4th DCA 1990), based on express and direct conflict with First Florida Bank, N.A. v. Max Mitchell & Co., 541 So.2d 155 (Fla. 2d DCA 1989), quashed, 558 So.2d 9 (Fla.1990), and Gordon v. Etue, Wardlaw & Co., 511 So.2d 384 (Fla. 1st DCA 1987), disapproved, First Florida Bank, 558 So.2d at 16. We now find that the basis of conflict jurisdiction has been eliminated by our opinion in First Florida Bank. Moreover, we find the result reached by the district court below to be consistent with the analysis in First Florida Bank. Accordingly, this petition is dismissed for lack of conflict jurisdiction.

It is so ordered.

SHAW, C.J., and OVERTON, McDonald, ehrlich, barkett, GRIMES and KOGAN, JJ., concur. NO MOTION FOR REHEARING WILL BE ENTERTAINED BY THE COURT.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

566 So. 2d 256, 15 Fla. L. Weekly Supp. 465, 1990 Fla. LEXIS 1141, 1990 WL 132924, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/forster-v-durham-fla-1990.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack