Forst v. Marshall

Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York

Forst v. Marshall

31 Misc. 766, 64 N.Y.S. 1135

CourtAppellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York

DecidedMay 15, 1900

StatusPublished

This text of 31 Misc. 766 (Forst v. Marshall) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Forst v. Marshall, 31 Misc. 766, 64 N.Y.S. 1135 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1900).

Pincite

Opinion

Per Curiam.

The evidence warranted findings of employment and performance. Enough appeared to show that the plaintiff was the procuring cause of the exchange.

Plaintiff’s Exhibit 3 in connection with the evidence is quite convincing that Mr. Grlickman’s memory was at fault when he was examined as a witness, and that the probabilities were with the version presented on behalf of the plaintiff as to the source of Mr. Grlickman’s information as to the Edgecombe avenue lots. There is no merit in the appeal, as there was no error which affected the result.

The judgment is affirmed, with costs.

Present: Tbuax, P. J., Scott and Dugbo, JJ.

Judgment affirmed, with costs.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI