Forsha v. Nebraska Moline Plow Co.

134 N.W. 522, 90 Neb. 736, 1912 Neb. LEXIS 143
CourtNebraska Supreme Court
DecidedFebruary 10, 1912
DocketNo. 16,411
StatusPublished

This text of 134 N.W. 522 (Forsha v. Nebraska Moline Plow Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Nebraska Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Forsha v. Nebraska Moline Plow Co., 134 N.W. 522, 90 Neb. 736, 1912 Neb. LEXIS 143 (Neb. 1912).

Opinion

Per Curiam.

Upon consideration of the motion for a rehearing, and in view of the rule announced in Chicago, St. P., M. & O. R. Co. v. McManigal, 73 Neb. 585, we are of opinion that no judgment should have been rendered on the verdict in this case.

It is therefore considered that the judgment against-the plaintiff and in favor of defendant Murdock & Son, and the judgment in favor of the plaintiff and against the Nebraska Moline Plow Company, should be reversed and the cause remanded to the district court for a new trial, with leave to the plaintiff to proceed against both of the defendants.

The motion for a rehearing is

Overruled.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
134 N.W. 522, 90 Neb. 736, 1912 Neb. LEXIS 143, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/forsha-v-nebraska-moline-plow-co-neb-1912.