Forsha v. Nebraska Moline Plow Co.
This text of 134 N.W. 522 (Forsha v. Nebraska Moline Plow Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Nebraska Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Upon consideration of the motion for a rehearing, and in view of the rule announced in Chicago, St. P., M. & O. R. Co. v. McManigal, 73 Neb. 585, we are of opinion that no judgment should have been rendered on the verdict in this case.
It is therefore considered that the judgment against-the plaintiff and in favor of defendant Murdock & Son, and the judgment in favor of the plaintiff and against the Nebraska Moline Plow Company, should be reversed and the cause remanded to the district court for a new trial, with leave to the plaintiff to proceed against both of the defendants.
The motion for a rehearing is
Overruled.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
134 N.W. 522, 90 Neb. 736, 1912 Neb. LEXIS 143, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/forsha-v-nebraska-moline-plow-co-neb-1912.