Forsdick v. Board of Mississippi Levee Commissioners

76 Miss. 859
CourtMississippi Supreme Court
DecidedMarch 15, 1899
StatusPublished

This text of 76 Miss. 859 (Forsdick v. Board of Mississippi Levee Commissioners) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Mississippi Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Forsdick v. Board of Mississippi Levee Commissioners, 76 Miss. 859 (Mich. 1899).

Opinion

Whitfield, J.,

delivered the opinion of the court.

If it should be conceded that under the case of Shotwell v. Railway Co., 69 Miss., 541, the ten-cent board did not get the title to the lands involved in this suit, nor any other right than the right to charge the levee taxes against the lands, it is certain that both under that case and the Woodruff case [not yet officially reported, but to be found in 25 South. Rep., 483], the purchaser of such lands from the state was bound to pay the levee taxes due that board, and that the lands - are not discharged therefrom, unless the claim is barred by the statute of limitations. But the allegations of the bill on this point are such that it was not demurrable. The demurrer is a general one and was properly overruled. The case made by the bill calls for an answer.

Affirmed with leme to file answer in sixty days from the fili/ng of the mandate in the court below.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Shotwell v. Louisville, New Orleans & Texas Railway Co.
69 Miss. 541 (Mississippi Supreme Court, 1891)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
76 Miss. 859, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/forsdick-v-board-of-mississippi-levee-commissioners-miss-1899.