Forsberg v. Abbracciamento

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Forsberg v. Abbracciamento

211 A.D.2d 526, 622 N.Y.S.2d 440

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedJanuary 19, 1995

StatusPublished

This text of 211 A.D.2d 526 (Forsberg v. Abbracciamento) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Forsberg v. Abbracciamento, 211 A.D.2d 526, 622 N.Y.S.2d 440 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1995).

Pincite

Opinion

Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Carol Huff, J.), entered March 9, 1994, which denied plaintiffs’ motion for summary judgment against defendants Frank Abbracciamento and FJM Marine Holding Corp., unanimously affirmed, without costs.

In view of the denial by the individual defendant-respondent that either he or his company were ever plaintiffs’ clients, there is an unresolved material question of fact precluding summary judgment. Concur—Rosenberger, J. P., Asch, Rubin and Nardelli, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Carol Huff, J.), entered March 9, 1994, which denied plaintiffs’ motion for summary judgment against defendants Frank Abbracciamento and FJM Marine Holding Corp., unanimously affirmed, without costs.

In view of the denial by the individual defendant-respondent that either he or his company were ever plaintiffs’ clients, there is an unresolved material question of fact precluding summary judgment. Concur—Rosenberger, J. P., Asch, Rubin and Nardelli, JJ.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

211 A.D.2d 526, 622 N.Y.S.2d 440, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/forsberg-v-abbracciamento-nyappdiv-1995.