Forsberg & Co. v. Seattle First National Bank

Ninth Circuit

Forsberg & Co. v. Seattle First National Bank

127 F.2d 861, 1942 U.S. App. LEXIS 3997

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit·Decided May 11, 1942·No. No. 10047·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

This cause coming before the Court on default of the appellant in failing to make deposit covering estimated expense of printing transcript of record as required by Rule 19 of the Rules of this Court, and it appearing from the files that appellants’ counsel have been notified that such default would be called to the Court’s attention on this date, and counsel for appellants having indicated that this cause has been settled, ordered appeal herein dismissed for failure of appellants to make deposit as required by Rule 19 of the Rules of this Court, that a judgment be filed and entered accordingly, and that mandate of -this court in this cause issue forthwith.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

This cause coming before the Court on default of the appellant in failing to make deposit covering estimated expense of printing transcript of record as required by Rule 19 of the Rules of this Court, and it appearing from the files that appellants’ counsel have been notified that such default would be called to the Court’s attention on this date, and counsel for appellants having indicated that this cause has been settled, ordered appeal herein dismissed for failure of appellants to make deposit as required by Rule 19 of the Rules of this Court, that a judgment be filed and entered accordingly, and that mandate of -this court in this cause issue forthwith.

Forsberg & Co. v. Seattle First National Bank, 127 F.2d 861, 1942 U.S. App. LEXIS 3997 (9th Cir. 1942).

Pincite

127 F.2d 861 (Forsberg & Co. v. Seattle First National Bank) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.