Forsberg & Co. v. Seattle First National Bank

127 F.2d 861, 1942 U.S. App. LEXIS 3997
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
DecidedMay 11, 1942
DocketNo. 10047
StatusPublished

This text of 127 F.2d 861 (Forsberg & Co. v. Seattle First National Bank) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Forsberg & Co. v. Seattle First National Bank, 127 F.2d 861, 1942 U.S. App. LEXIS 3997 (9th Cir. 1942).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

This cause coming before the Court on default of the appellant in failing to make deposit covering estimated expense of printing transcript of record as required by Rule 19 of the Rules of this Court, and it appearing from the files that appellants’ counsel have been notified that such default would be called to the Court’s attention on this date, and counsel for appellants having indicated that this cause has been settled, ordered appeal herein dismissed for failure of appellants to make deposit as required by Rule 19 of the Rules of this Court, that a judgment be filed and entered accordingly, and that mandate of -this court in this cause issue forthwith.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
127 F.2d 861, 1942 U.S. App. LEXIS 3997, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/forsberg-co-v-seattle-first-national-bank-ca9-1942.