Forrester v. Nappier

422 S.W.3d 410, 2013 WL 6199339, 2013 Mo. App. LEXIS 1404
Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided November 26, 2013·No. No. ED 100055·Published

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Patricia A. Nappier appeals the interlocutory order and judgment for possession and writ of possession entered by the trial court granting physical possession of property located at 826 Potosí Street in Farm-ington, Missouri (“the property”) to John S. Forrester. The trial court had authority to enter the interlocutory order and judgment of possession, and the judgment was not erroneous. We affirm.

An extended opinion would have no precedential value. We have, however, provided the parties a memorandum setting forth the reasons for our decision. The judgment of the trial court is affirmed under Rule 84.16(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Forrester v. Nappier, 422 S.W.3d 410, 2013 WL 6199339, 2013 Mo. App. LEXIS 1404 (Mo. Ct. App. 2013).

422 S.W.3d 410 (Forrester v. Nappier) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.