Forrester v. Forrester

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Forrester v. Forrester

258 A.D. 781, 15 N.Y.S.2d 723, 1939 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 6874

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedNovember 3, 1939

StatusPublished

This text of 258 A.D. 781 (Forrester v. Forrester) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Forrester v. Forrester, 258 A.D. 781, 15 N.Y.S.2d 723, 1939 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 6874 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1939).

Pincite

Opinion

Order denying plaintiff’s motion to punish defendant for contempt for failure to pay alimony pendente lite and counsel fee, and reducing the alimony, unanimously reversed, and the question of the financial ability of defendant to comply with the directions contained in the order of the court entered March 28, 1939, which fixed the alimony, is referred to an official referee to take testimony and to report back to the Special Term, Part I, as to the financial condition of defendant and his ability to comply with the terms of the court’s order. Upon the coming in of the report of the official referee the Special Term then is to determine (1) the application to punish the defendant for contempt and (2) whether the terms of the order of March 28, 1939, should be modified. (Civ. Prac. Act, § 1172-a, subd. 3.) [782]*782Settle order on notice. Present —1 Martin, P. J., Townley, Untermyer, Cohn and Callahan, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Order denying plaintiff’s motion to punish defendant for contempt for failure to pay alimony pendente lite and counsel fee, and reducing the alimony, unanimously reversed, and the question of the financial ability of defendant to comply with the directions contained in the order of the court entered March 28, 1939, which fixed the alimony, is referred to an official referee to take testimony and to report back to the Special Term, Part I, as to the financial condition of defendant and his ability to comply with the terms of the court’s order. Upon the coming in of the report of the official referee the Special Term then is to determine (1) the application to punish the defendant for contempt and (2) whether the terms of the order of March 28, 1939, should be modified. (Civ. Prac. Act, § 1172-a, subd. 3.) [782]*782Settle order on notice. Present —1 Martin, P. J., Townley, Untermyer, Cohn and Callahan, JJ.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

258 A.D. 781, 15 N.Y.S.2d 723, 1939 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 6874, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/forrester-v-forrester-nyappdiv-1939.