Forrestel v. Jonkman

148 A.D.3d 1676, 48 N.Y.S.3d 901
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedMarch 24, 2017
DocketAppeal No. 2
StatusPublished

This text of 148 A.D.3d 1676 (Forrestel v. Jonkman) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Forrestel v. Jonkman, 148 A.D.3d 1676, 48 N.Y.S.3d 901 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2017).

Opinion

Appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Erie County (Tracey A. Bannister, J.), entered December 15, 2015. The order denied the cross motion of defendant seeking, inter alia, an order directing plaintiff to pay defendant $1,231.52 pursuant to the property settlement agreement, and reserved decision of plaintiff’s motion seeking, inter alia, an order directing defendant to pay to plaintiff certain amounts under the property settlement agreement.

It is hereby ordered that said appeal from the order insofar as it reserved decision on plaintiff’s motion is unanimously dismissed, and the order is affirmed without costs.

Same memorandum as in Forrestel v Jonkman ([appeal No. 1] 148 AD3d 1674 [2017]).

Present — Whalen, P.J., Smith, Carni, Lindley and NeMoyer, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

FORRESTEL, RYAN M. v. JONKMAN, MARGUERITA M.C.
148 A.D.3d 1674 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2017)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
148 A.D.3d 1676, 48 N.Y.S.3d 901, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/forrestel-v-jonkman-nyappdiv-2017.