Forrest v. Woodall

33 Tex. 363
CourtTexas Supreme Court
DecidedJuly 1, 1870
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 33 Tex. 363 (Forrest v. Woodall) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Texas Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Forrest v. Woodall, 33 Tex. 363 (Tex. 1870).

Opinion

Walker, J.

On the fourteenth day of February, 1857, the plaintiff brought suit in the district court to recover six hundred ■and forty acres of land.

For title he counted on a patent from the State, issued to him on the fourteenth day of May, 1855.

The defendants, claimed under one Martin, who was said to have settled on the land in 1835. They failed to make good any connection between themselves and Martin.

The case falls within the rule established by this court in Smith v. Power, 23 Texas R,, 29; Taylor v. Watkins, 26 Texas R., 688; Yancey v. Norris, 27 Texas R., 40; Walker v. Hanks, 27 Texas R., 535.

The judgment of the court below was erroneous, and must be reversed. We therefore reverse the judgment,, and order the writ of restitution to issue to the sheriff of Rusk county, and that the plaintiff recover hiis costs in this court and in the court below.

Reversed and rendered-

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Paschal v. Dangerfield
37 Tex. 273 (Texas Supreme Court, 1873)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
33 Tex. 363, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/forrest-v-woodall-tex-1870.