Forrest v. Wilson
This text of 889 So. 2d 124 (Forrest v. Wilson) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Ryan FORREST, Appellant,
v.
Katherine S. WILSON, Individually and on behalf of Minors, etc., Appellee.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.
William Mallory Kent, Esq. of The Law Office of William Mallory Kent, Jacksonville, for Appellant.
Katherine S. Wilson, pro se, for Appellee.
PER CURIAM.
Because the trial court's finding that appellant stalked and harassed appellee's minor child by repeatedly engaging in certain acts is not supported by competent, substantial evidence, the permanent injunction against repeat violence is REVERSED. See § 784.048(2), Fla. Stat. (2003) (providing that "[a]ny person who willfully, maliciously, and repeatedly follows, harasses, or cyberstalks another person commits the offense of stalking ..."); see also McMath v. Biernacki, 776 So.2d 1039, 1040 (Fla. 1st DCA 2001) (applying *125 the competent, substantial evidence standard of review in reviewing an injunction against repeat violence).
BROWNING, LEWIS and POLSTON, JJ., CONCUR.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
889 So. 2d 124, 2004 WL 2724089, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/forrest-v-wilson-fladistctapp-2004.