Forrest v. Wilson

889 So. 2d 124, 2004 WL 2724089
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedNovember 30, 2004
Docket1D04-0125
StatusPublished
Cited by2 cases

This text of 889 So. 2d 124 (Forrest v. Wilson) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Forrest v. Wilson, 889 So. 2d 124, 2004 WL 2724089 (Fla. Ct. App. 2004).

Opinion

889 So.2d 124 (2004)

Ryan FORREST, Appellant,
v.
Katherine S. WILSON, Individually and on behalf of Minors, etc., Appellee.

No. 1D04-0125.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

November 30, 2004.

William Mallory Kent, Esq. of The Law Office of William Mallory Kent, Jacksonville, for Appellant.

Katherine S. Wilson, pro se, for Appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Because the trial court's finding that appellant stalked and harassed appellee's minor child by repeatedly engaging in certain acts is not supported by competent, substantial evidence, the permanent injunction against repeat violence is REVERSED. See § 784.048(2), Fla. Stat. (2003) (providing that "[a]ny person who willfully, maliciously, and repeatedly follows, harasses, or cyberstalks another person commits the offense of stalking ..."); see also McMath v. Biernacki, 776 So.2d 1039, 1040 (Fla. 1st DCA 2001) (applying *125 the competent, substantial evidence standard of review in reviewing an injunction against repeat violence).

BROWNING, LEWIS and POLSTON, JJ., CONCUR.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Terrell v. Thompson
935 So. 2d 592 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2006)
Santiago v. Towle
917 So. 2d 909 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2005)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
889 So. 2d 124, 2004 WL 2724089, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/forrest-v-wilson-fladistctapp-2004.