Home/District Court of Appeal of Florida/Forrest v. State

Forrest v. State

101 So. 3d 1268, 2012 Fla. App. LEXIS 20906, 2012 WL 6027707
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided December 5, 2012·No. No. 4D12-3468·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed. Padilla v. Kentucky, 559 U.S. 356, 130 S.Ct. 1473, 176 L.Ed.2d 284 (2010), is not retroactive. See Hernandez v. State, 61 So.3d 1144 (Fla. 3D DCA 2011), affirmed, Hernandez v. State, 2012 WL 5869660 (Fla. Nov.21, 2012).

WARNER, GROSS and CIKLIN, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Forrest v. State, 101 So. 3d 1268, 2012 Fla. App. LEXIS 20906, 2012 WL 6027707 (Fla. Ct. App. 2012).

101 So. 3d 1268 (Forrest v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Padilla v. Kentucky
559 U.S. 356 (Supreme Court, 2010)
Hernandez v. State
124 So. 3d 757 (Supreme Court of Florida, 2012)
Hernandez v. State
61 So. 3d 1144 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2011)