Forrest v. State

101 So. 3d 1268, 2012 Fla. App. LEXIS 20906, 2012 WL 6027707
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedDecember 5, 2012
DocketNo. 4D12-3468
StatusPublished

This text of 101 So. 3d 1268 (Forrest v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Forrest v. State, 101 So. 3d 1268, 2012 Fla. App. LEXIS 20906, 2012 WL 6027707 (Fla. Ct. App. 2012).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed. Padilla v. Kentucky, 559 U.S. 356, 130 S.Ct. 1473, 176 L.Ed.2d 284 (2010), is not retroactive. See Hernandez v. State, 61 So.3d 1144 (Fla. 3D DCA 2011), affirmed, Hernandez v. State, 2012 WL 5869660 (Fla. Nov.21, 2012).

WARNER, GROSS and CIKLIN, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Padilla v. Kentucky
559 U.S. 356 (Supreme Court, 2010)
Hernandez v. State
124 So. 3d 757 (Supreme Court of Florida, 2012)
Hernandez v. State
61 So. 3d 1144 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2011)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
101 So. 3d 1268, 2012 Fla. App. LEXIS 20906, 2012 WL 6027707, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/forrest-v-state-fladistctapp-2012.