Forrest v. State

603 So. 2d 508, 17 Fla. L. Weekly Supp. 583, 1992 Fla. LEXIS 1566, 1992 WL 212011
Supreme Court of Florida·Decided September 3, 1992·No. No. 78955·Published

Opinions

PER CURIAM.

Upon the authority of Scates v. State, 603 So.2d 504 (Fla.1992), we quash State v. Forrest, 588 So.2d 72 (Fla. 4th DCA 1991), [509]*509and remand with directions to reinstate Forrest’s probation.

It is so ordered.

BARKETT, C.J., and OVERTON, SHAW and KOGAN, JJ., concur. GRIMES, J., dissents with an opinion, in which HARDING, J., concurs. McDONALD, J., dissents.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Forrest v. State, 603 So. 2d 508, 17 Fla. L. Weekly Supp. 583, 1992 Fla. LEXIS 1566, 1992 WL 212011 (Fla. 1992).

603 So. 2d 508 (Forrest v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Scates v. State
603 So. 2d 504 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1992)
State v. Forrest
588 So. 2d 72 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1991)