Forrest v. Forrest

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Forrest v. Forrest

131 A.D.2d 425, 516 N.Y.S.2d 79, 1987 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 47889

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedJune 1, 1987

StatusPublished

Cited by2 cases

This text of 131 A.D.2d 425 (Forrest v. Forrest) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Forrest v. Forrest, 131 A.D.2d 425, 516 N.Y.S.2d 79, 1987 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 47889 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1987).

Pincite

Opinion

In an action for a divorce and ancillary relief, the plaintiff wife appeals, as limited by her brief, from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Nassau County (Velsor, J.), dated July 11, 1986, as denied, without prejudice to renewal, her motion for a psychiatric examination of the defendant husband, and (2) the defendant husband cross-appeals from so much of the same order as denied, without prejudice to renewal, his motion for a psychiatric examination of the plaintiff wife and their two children.

Ordered that the order is affirmed, without costs or disbursements.

The parties in this matrimonial action, as well as their oldest child, have been examined by the Forensic Services [426]*426Division of the Nassau County Department of Mental Health. We conclude that Special Term properly denied the plaintiffs motion and the defendant’s cross motion for further psychiatric evaluations by the parties’ respective experts "absent any indication that the investigatory and analytical efforts of the Forensic Division were deficient in any respect” (Rosenblitt v Rosenblitt, 107 AD2d 292, 296; see also, Lohmiller v Lohmiller, 118 AD2d 760). Bracken, J. P., Rubin, Fiber and Spatt, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In an action for a divorce and ancillary relief, the plaintiff wife appeals, as limited by her brief, from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Nassau County (Velsor, J.), dated July 11, 1986, as denied, without prejudice to renewal, her motion for a psychiatric examination of the defendant husband, and (2) the defendant husband cross-appeals from so much of the same order as denied, without prejudice to renewal, his motion for a psychiatric examination of the plaintiff wife and their two children.

Ordered that the order is affirmed, without costs or disbursements.

The parties in this matrimonial action, as well as their oldest child, have been examined by the Forensic Services [426]*426Division of the Nassau County Department of Mental Health. We conclude that Special Term properly denied the plaintiffs motion and the defendant’s cross motion for further psychiatric evaluations by the parties’ respective experts "absent any indication that the investigatory and analytical efforts of the Forensic Division were deficient in any respect” (Rosenblitt v Rosenblitt, 107 AD2d 292, 296; see also, Lohmiller v Lohmiller, 118 AD2d 760). Bracken, J. P., Rubin, Fiber and Spatt, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

131 A.D.2d 425, 516 N.Y.S.2d 79, 1987 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 47889, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/forrest-v-forrest-nyappdiv-1987.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack