FORREST v. CITY OF TULSA
This text of 2019 OK 16 (FORREST v. CITY OF TULSA) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Oklahoma primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
FORREST v. CITY OF TULSA
2019 OK 16
439 P.3d 963
Case Number: 115803
Decided: 04/02/2019
THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF OKLAHOMA
Cite as: 2019 OK 16, 439 P.3d 963
CHRISTOPHER FORREST, Petitioner,
v.
CITY OF TULSA, OWN RISK #10435, and THE WORKERS'COMPENSATION COMMISSION, Respondents.
MEMORANDUM OPINION
¶1 This is an appeal of an Order Affirming Decision of Administrative Law Judge by the Oklahoma Workers' Compensation Commission En Banc filed on February 21, 2017. Petitioner suffered a compensable injury after the effective date of the Administrative Workers' Compensation Act (AWCA) (Title 85A). The Administrative Law Judge (ALJ) awarded Petitioner Permanent Partial Disability (PPD). The ALJ also determined the City of Tulsa was entitled to a credit from the PPD award in the sum of $1,095.20, pursuant to 85A O.S. § 89. The Petitioner challenged the constitutionality of this credit. The ALJ found the credit against PPD awards was constitutional. The Oklahoma Workers' Compensation Commission En Banc affirmed. The dispositive issue on appeal concerns the constitutionality of the employer credit against PPD awards. This cause was assigned to this office on March 28, 2018.
¶2 Upon review of the record and briefs of the parties, this Court has determined the issues raised in this appeal have already been decided in our recent opinion in Braitsch v. City of Tulsa, 2018 OK 100, ____P.3d______, 2018 WL 6617141. In Braitsch, this Court held the credit provided under 85A O.S. § 89 was constitutional. The Order of the Oklahoma Workers' Compensation Commission En Banc is affirmed.
¶3 Wyrick, V.C.J., Kauger, Winchester, Combs and Darby, JJ., concur.
¶4 Edmondson, J., concurs by reason of stare decisis.
¶5 Gurich, C.J., Colbert and Reif, JJ., dissent.
| Cite | Name | Level |
|---|---|---|
| None Found. |
| Cite | Name | Level | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oklahoma Supreme Court Cases | |||
| Cite | Name | Level | |
| 2018 OK 100, 436 P.3d 14, | BRAITSCH v. CITY OF TULSA | Cited | |
| Title 85A. Workers' Compensation | |||
| Cite | Name | Level | |
| 85A O.S. 89, | Reimbursement - Deductions | Discussed | |
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
2019 OK 16, 439 P.3d 963, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/forrest-v-city-of-tulsa-okla-2019.