Forrest S. Pullen v. Catlin, Inc. Catlin Underwriting Agency, U.S., Inc. and Eugenie Shea

Court of Appeals of Texas

Forrest S. Pullen v. Catlin, Inc. Catlin Underwriting Agency, U.S., Inc. and Eugenie Shea

DecidedFebruary 28, 2008

Docket14-08-00001-CV

StatusPublished

This text of Forrest S. Pullen v. Catlin, Inc. Catlin Underwriting Agency, U.S., Inc. and Eugenie Shea (Forrest S. Pullen v. Catlin, Inc. Catlin Underwriting Agency, U.S., Inc. and Eugenie Shea) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Forrest S. Pullen v. Catlin, Inc. Catlin Underwriting Agency, U.S., Inc. and Eugenie Shea, (Tex. Ct. App. 2008).

Pincite

Opinion

Dismissed and Memorandum Opinion filed February 28, 2008

Dismissed and Memorandum Opinion filed February 28, 2008.

In The

Fourteenth Court of Appeals

____________

NO. 14-08-00001-CV

FORREST S. PULLEN, Appellant

V.

CATLIN, INC. CATLIN UNDERWRITING AGENCY U.S., INC.

and EUGENIE SHEA, Appellees

On Appeal from the 333rd District Court

Harris County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. 2005-67189

M E M O R A N D U M O P I N I O N

This appeal is from a judgment signed September 25, 2007. Appellant filed a timely motion for new trial. The notice of appeal was filed December 26, 2007. To date, our records show that appellant has neither established indigence nor paid the $175.00 appellate filing fee. See Tex. R. App. P. 5 (requiring payment of fees in civil cases unless indigent); Tex. R. App. P. 20.1 (listing requirements for establishing indigence); see also Order Regarding Fees Charged in Civil Cases in the Supreme Court and the Courts of Appeals and Before the Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation, Misc. Docket No. 07-9138 (Tex. Aug. 28, 2007) (listing fees in court of appeals); Tex. Gov=t Code Ann. ' 51.207 (Vernon 2005) (same). On January 29, 2008, appellant was notified that the filing fee was past due and the appeal was subject to dismissal. No response was filed.

The clerk=s record was due January 23, 2008, but it has not been filed. The clerk responsible for preparing the record in this appeal informed the court appellant did not make arrangements to pay for the record. On January 31, 2008, notification was transmitted to all parties of the court=s intention to dismiss the appeal for want of prosecution unless, within fifteen days, appellant paid or made arrangements to pay for the record and provided this court with proof of payment. See Tex. R. App. P. 37.3(b). Appellant has not provided this court with proof of payment for the record or otherwise responded to this court=s notice.

Accordingly, the appeal is ordered dismissed.

PER CURIAM

Judgment rendered and Memorandum Opinion filed February 28, 2008.

Panel consists of Chief Justice Hedges and Justices Anderson and Boyce.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Dismissed and Memorandum Opinion filed February 28, 2008

Dismissed and Memorandum Opinion filed February 28, 2008.

In The

Fourteenth Court of Appeals

____________

NO. 14-08-00001-CV

FORREST S. PULLEN, Appellant

V.

CATLIN, INC. CATLIN UNDERWRITING AGENCY U.S., INC.

and EUGENIE SHEA, Appellees

On Appeal from the 333rd District Court

Harris County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. 2005-67189

M E M O R A N D U M O P I N I O N

This appeal is from a judgment signed September 25, 2007. Appellant filed a timely motion for new trial. The notice of appeal was filed December 26, 2007. To date, our records show that appellant has neither established indigence nor paid the $175.00 appellate filing fee. See Tex. R. App. P. 5 (requiring payment of fees in civil cases unless indigent); Tex. R. App. P. 20.1 (listing requirements for establishing indigence); see also Order Regarding Fees Charged in Civil Cases in the Supreme Court and the Courts of Appeals and Before the Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation, Misc. Docket No. 07-9138 (Tex. Aug. 28, 2007) (listing fees in court of appeals); Tex. Gov=t Code Ann. ' 51.207 (Vernon 2005) (same). On January 29, 2008, appellant was notified that the filing fee was past due and the appeal was subject to dismissal. No response was filed.

The clerk=s record was due January 23, 2008, but it has not been filed. The clerk responsible for preparing the record in this appeal informed the court appellant did not make arrangements to pay for the record. On January 31, 2008, notification was transmitted to all parties of the court=s intention to dismiss the appeal for want of prosecution unless, within fifteen days, appellant paid or made arrangements to pay for the record and provided this court with proof of payment. See Tex. R. App. P. 37.3(b). Appellant has not provided this court with proof of payment for the record or otherwise responded to this court=s notice.

Accordingly, the appeal is ordered dismissed.

PER CURIAM

Judgment rendered and Memorandum Opinion filed February 28, 2008.

Panel consists of Chief Justice Hedges and Justices Anderson and Boyce.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

Forrest S. Pullen v. Catlin, Inc. Catlin Underwriting Agency, U.S., Inc. and Eugenie Shea, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/forrest-s-pullen-v-catlin-inc-catlin-underwriting--texapp-2008.