Forrest King v. Lucinda Silva

CourtCourt of Appeals of Texas
DecidedOctober 2, 2014
Docket01-14-00401-CV
StatusPublished

This text of Forrest King v. Lucinda Silva (Forrest King v. Lucinda Silva) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Forrest King v. Lucinda Silva, (Tex. Ct. App. 2014).

Opinion

Opinion issued October 2, 2014

In The

Court of Appeals For The

First District of Texas ———————————— NO. 01-14-00401-CV ——————————— FORREST KING, Appellant V. LUCINDA SILVA, Appellee

On Appeal from the 309th Judicial District Court Harris County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. 2013-06254

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Appellant, Forrest King, has neither paid the required fees nor established

indigence for purposes of appellate costs. See TEX. R. APP. P. 5, 20.1; see also

TEX. GOV’T CODE ANN. §§ 51.207, 51.941(a), 101.041 (West 2013); Order

Regarding Fees Charged in the Supreme Court, in Civil Cases in the Courts of Appeals, and Before the Judicial Panel on Multi-District Litigation, Misc. Docket

No. 13-9127 (Tex. Aug. 16, 2013). After being notified by the Clerk of this Court

on June 5, 2014, that this appeal was subject to dismissal, appellant did not

respond. See TEX. R. APP. P. 5, 42.3(c).

Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal for nonpayment of all required fees and

for want of prosecution. See TEX. R. APP. P. 5, 42.3(b), (c). We dismiss any

pending motions as moot.

PER CURIAM Panel consists of Chief Justice Radack and Justices Jennings and Keyes.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Forrest King v. Lucinda Silva, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/forrest-king-v-lucinda-silva-texapp-2014.