Forrest King v. Lucinda Silva
This text of Forrest King v. Lucinda Silva (Forrest King v. Lucinda Silva) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Opinion issued October 2, 2014
In The
Court of Appeals For The
First District of Texas ———————————— NO. 01-14-00401-CV ——————————— FORREST KING, Appellant V. LUCINDA SILVA, Appellee
On Appeal from the 309th Judicial District Court Harris County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. 2013-06254
MEMORANDUM OPINION
Appellant, Forrest King, has neither paid the required fees nor established
indigence for purposes of appellate costs. See TEX. R. APP. P. 5, 20.1; see also
TEX. GOV’T CODE ANN. §§ 51.207, 51.941(a), 101.041 (West 2013); Order
Regarding Fees Charged in the Supreme Court, in Civil Cases in the Courts of Appeals, and Before the Judicial Panel on Multi-District Litigation, Misc. Docket
No. 13-9127 (Tex. Aug. 16, 2013). After being notified by the Clerk of this Court
on June 5, 2014, that this appeal was subject to dismissal, appellant did not
respond. See TEX. R. APP. P. 5, 42.3(c).
Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal for nonpayment of all required fees and
for want of prosecution. See TEX. R. APP. P. 5, 42.3(b), (c). We dismiss any
pending motions as moot.
PER CURIAM Panel consists of Chief Justice Radack and Justices Jennings and Keyes.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Forrest King v. Lucinda Silva, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/forrest-king-v-lucinda-silva-texapp-2014.