Forquer v. Samuel I. White, P.C.

Fourth Circuit

Forquer v. Samuel I. White, P.C.

683 F. App'x 221

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit

DecidedApril 3, 2017

DocketNo. 16-2458

StatusPublished

This text of 683 F. App'x 221 (Forquer v. Samuel I. White, P.C.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Forquer v. Samuel I. White, P.C., 683 F. App'x 221 (4th Cir. 2017).

Pincite

Opinion

[222]*222Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Sandra S. Forquer appeals the district court’s order dismissing her civil complaint for failure to state a claim upon which relief may be granted and a subsequent order denying reconsideration. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Forquer v. White, No. 1:16-cv-03795-ELH, 2016 WL 7239722 (D. Md. filed Dec. 2, 2016 & entered Dec. 5, 2016; Dec. 15, 2016). We grant Forquer leave to proceed in forma pauperis on appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

[222]*222Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Sandra S. Forquer appeals the district court’s order dismissing her civil complaint for failure to state a claim upon which relief may be granted and a subsequent order denying reconsideration. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Forquer v. White, No. 1:16-cv-03795-ELH, 2016 WL 7239722 (D. Md. filed Dec. 2, 2016 & entered Dec. 5, 2016; Dec. 15, 2016). We grant Forquer leave to proceed in forma pauperis on appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

683 F. App'x 221, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/forquer-v-samuel-i-white-pc-ca4-2017.