Fornwald v. Nelson

42 Colo. 178
Supreme Court of Colorado·Decided January 15, 1908·No. No. 5293; No. 2928 C. A.·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

Mr. Justice Campbell

delivered the opinion of the court:

This is an action by plaintiffs (appellees here), appropriators and users of water for irrigation from the-Alamosa river in water district No. 21 in this state, against defendants (appellants), appropriators from the same stream, to restrain the latter from diverting and using water from such stream to the injury of plaintiffs, who, as against defendants, are said to be prior appropriators. The judgment was for plaintiffs, and defendants appeal.

Precisely the same questions of law, and largely the same questions of fact, are involved in this case as in Alamosa Creek Canal Co. v. Nelson, the opinion in which is published ante, p. 140; indeed, some of the evidence is exactly the same in both cases. All these questions, we think, were correctly decided by the trial court, and upon the authority of the foregoing decision the judgment is affirmed.

Affirmed.

Chief Justice Steele and Mr. Justice Gabbert concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Fornwald v. Nelson, 42 Colo. 178 (Colo. 1908).

42 Colo. 178 (Fornwald v. Nelson) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Terrace Irrigation District v. Overflow Ditch No. 1
69 Colo. 362 (Supreme Court of Colorado, 1921)