Fornieri v. Fornieri

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Fornieri v. Fornieri

26 A.D.2d 640, 272 N.Y.S.2d 983, 1966 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3679

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedJuly 5, 1966

StatusPublished

This text of 26 A.D.2d 640 (Fornieri v. Fornieri) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Fornieri v. Fornieri, 26 A.D.2d 640, 272 N.Y.S.2d 983, 1966 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3679 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1966).

Pincite

Opinion

In a support proceeding pursuant to article 4 of the Family Court Act, the petitioner wife appeals from an order of the Family Court, Kings County, entered March 23, 1966, which directed her husband to pay $15 a week for her support. Order modified on the facts by increasing the amount of support to $30 per week. As so modified, order affirmed, with costs. Findings of fact inconsistent herewith are reversed and new findings are made as indicated herein. Petitioner’s application for counsel fees is denied, with leave to renew in the Family Court pursuant to statute (Family Court Act, § 438). In our opinion, under all the circumstances, the payment of $15 a week on a means basis is inadequate. Beldock, P. J., Ughetta, Hill, Rabin and Benjamin, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In a support proceeding pursuant to article 4 of the Family Court Act, the petitioner wife appeals from an order of the Family Court, Kings County, entered March 23, 1966, which directed her husband to pay $15 a week for her support. Order modified on the facts by increasing the amount of support to $30 per week. As so modified, order affirmed, with costs. Findings of fact inconsistent herewith are reversed and new findings are made as indicated herein. Petitioner’s application for counsel fees is denied, with leave to renew in the Family Court pursuant to statute (Family Court Act, § 438). In our opinion, under all the circumstances, the payment of $15 a week on a means basis is inadequate. Beldock, P. J., Ughetta, Hill, Rabin and Benjamin, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

26 A.D.2d 640, 272 N.Y.S.2d 983, 1966 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3679, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/fornieri-v-fornieri-nyappdiv-1966.