Forney v. State

594 So. 2d 305, 17 Fla. L. Weekly Supp. 151, 1992 Fla. LEXIS 189, 1992 WL 34691
CourtSupreme Court of Florida
DecidedFebruary 27, 1992
DocketNo. 76900
StatusPublished

This text of 594 So. 2d 305 (Forney v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Forney v. State, 594 So. 2d 305, 17 Fla. L. Weekly Supp. 151, 1992 Fla. LEXIS 189, 1992 WL 34691 (Fla. 1992).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

We have for review Forney v. State, 567 So.2d 60 (Fla. 4th D.C.A.1990), which certified the same question recently answered by the Court in Barfield v. State, 594 So.2d 259 (Fla.1992). We have jurisdiction. Art. V, § 3(b)(4), Fla. Const. We quash the [306]*306opinion below and remand for reconsideration in light of Barfield.

It is so ordered.

SHAW, C.J., and OVERTON, McDonald, barkett, grimes, KOGAN and HARDING, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Forney v. State
567 So. 2d 60 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1990)
Barfield v. State
594 So. 2d 259 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1992)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
594 So. 2d 305, 17 Fla. L. Weekly Supp. 151, 1992 Fla. LEXIS 189, 1992 WL 34691, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/forney-v-state-fla-1992.