Forney v. Black Mountain Railroad

74 S.E. 884, 159 N.C. 157, 1912 N.C. LEXIS 248
CourtSupreme Court of North Carolina
DecidedMay 8, 1912
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 74 S.E. 884 (Forney v. Black Mountain Railroad) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of North Carolina primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Forney v. Black Mountain Railroad, 74 S.E. 884, 159 N.C. 157, 1912 N.C. LEXIS 248 (N.C. 1912).

Opinion

Clasrk, C. J.

This is an appeal from a refusal of a motion to remove the cause from Mitchell County to Yancey. The plaintiff is a resident of Yancey County. The defendant is a railroad company, having its principal place of business in Yancey, with its line partly in Mitchell and partly in Yancey. The cause of action is a personal injury which occurred in Yancey County.

This case falls directly under the proviso in Eevisal, 424, that “an action against a railroad shall be tried either in the county where the cause of action arose or in the county where the plaintiff resided at the time the cause of action arose,” or “in some county adjoining the county in which the cause of action arose,” subject to the power of the court to change the place of *158 trial. This application for the change of venue was not made on the ground of the convenience of witnesses or on account of local prejudice, which are matters within the irreviewable discretion of the presiding judge, but upon the ground that the proper venue was in Yancey County. Mitchell adjoins Yancey, and under the proviso in Revisal, 424, above quoted, the plaintiff had his election to bring the action either in Yancey or in any adjoining county. In Propst v. R. R., 139 N. C., 397, the proviso was construed and it was held that this section of the Re-visal applied to all railroads, both domestic and foreign.

Under the preceding sections 419 (1) an action against a railroad for setting out fire must be brought in the county where the land lies. Perry v. R. R., 153 N. C., 117. Section 424 provides for venue “in all other cases,” with the proviso as to railroads, which must be construed as applying to all cases not provided for in the preceding sections. Propst v. R. R., 139 N. C., 399.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

John P. Nutt Corp. v. Southern Railway Co.
197 S.E. 534 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1938)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
74 S.E. 884, 159 N.C. 157, 1912 N.C. LEXIS 248, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/forney-v-black-mountain-railroad-nc-1912.