Fornal v. Fornal

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Fornal v. Fornal

247 A.D. 782

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided March 15, 1936·Published

Opinion

Action to impress a trust on certain real property known as 707 Tinton avenue, borough of the Bronx, New York. Order denying plaintiff’s motion to amend finding of fact [783]*783numbered “ 2,” and the judgment dismissing the complaint on the merits, unanimously affirmed. While the testimony established a loan by the plaintiff to be repaid sometime in the future on demand, no trust affecting the real estate was established. Present — Martin, P. J., Townley, Untermyer, Dore and Cohn, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Action to impress a trust on certain real property known as 707 Tinton avenue, borough of the Bronx, New York. Order denying plaintiff’s motion to amend finding of fact [783]*783numbered “ 2,” and the judgment dismissing the complaint on the merits, unanimously affirmed. While the testimony established a loan by the plaintiff to be repaid sometime in the future on demand, no trust affecting the real estate was established. Present — Martin, P. J., Townley, Untermyer, Dore and Cohn, JJ.

Fornal v. Fornal, 247 A.D. 782 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1936).

Pincite

247 A.D. 782 (Fornal v. Fornal) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.