Fornagiel v. Wacholder
4 N.E.2d 817, 272 N.Y. 589, 1936 N.Y. LEXIS 1080
Opinion
Judgment affirmed, with costs; no opinion.
Concur: Hubbs, Crouch, Loughran and Finch, JJ. Dissenting: Crane, Ch. J., Lehman and O’Brien, JJ.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Fornagiel v. Wacholder, 4 N.E.2d 817, 272 N.Y. 589, 1936 N.Y. LEXIS 1080 (N.Y. 1936).
4 N.E.2d 817 (Fornagiel v. Wacholder) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Vavallo v. Consolidated Edison Co.
150 A.D.2d 556 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1989)
Tuttle v. Gold
3 A.D.2d 760 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1957)
Ferdinando v. Rosenthal
169 Misc. 953 (City of New York Municipal Court, 1938)