Fornaby v. Zoning Board of Appeals

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Fornaby v. Zoning Board of Appeals

103 A.D.2d 830, 478 N.Y.S.2d 809, 1984 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 19467

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedJuly 23, 1984

StatusPublished

This text of 103 A.D.2d 830 (Fornaby v. Zoning Board of Appeals) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Fornaby v. Zoning Board of Appeals, 103 A.D.2d 830, 478 N.Y.S.2d 809, 1984 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 19467 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1984).

Pincite

Opinion

— In a proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 to review a determination of the City Council of the City of Yonkers, which approved a determination of the Zoning Board of Appeals of the City of Yonkers, which granted the application of the interveners for a special exception use permit, petitioner appeals from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Westchester County, entered May 4, 1983, which dismissed the petition. 11 Judgment affirmed, with one bill of costs, for reasons stated in the opinion of Justice Kelly at Special Term (see, also, Matter of Town of Bedford v Village of Mount Kisco, 33 NY2d 178, 186-189; Curtiss-Wright Corp. v Town of East Hampton, 82 AD2d 551, 557). Mollen, P. J., Gibbons, Weinstein and Rubin, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

— In a proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 to review a determination of the City Council of the City of Yonkers, which approved a determination of the Zoning Board of Appeals of the City of Yonkers, which granted the application of the interveners for a special exception use permit, petitioner appeals from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Westchester County, entered May 4, 1983, which dismissed the petition. 11 Judgment affirmed, with one bill of costs, for reasons stated in the opinion of Justice Kelly at Special Term (see, also, Matter of Town of Bedford v Village of Mount Kisco, 33 NY2d 178, 186-189; Curtiss-Wright Corp. v Town of East Hampton, 82 AD2d 551, 557). Mollen, P. J., Gibbons, Weinstein and Rubin, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

103 A.D.2d 830, 478 N.Y.S.2d 809, 1984 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 19467, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/fornaby-v-zoning-board-of-appeals-nyappdiv-1984.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack