Former Employees of Merrill Corp. v. United States Department of Labor

30 Ct. Int'l Trade 649
CourtUnited States Court of International Trade
DecidedJuly 1, 2006
DocketCourt No. 03-00662
StatusPublished

This text of 30 Ct. Int'l Trade 649 (Former Employees of Merrill Corp. v. United States Department of Labor) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering United States Court of International Trade primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Former Employees of Merrill Corp. v. United States Department of Labor, 30 Ct. Int'l Trade 649 (cit 2006).

Opinion

ORDER

CARMAN, Judge:

Upon consideration of Plaintiff’s letter dated April 14, 2006, advising the Court of a change in Department of Labor policy, it is hereby

[650]*650ORDERED that this case is remanded to the Department of Labor to determine what, if any, affect its decision in Lands’ End, A Subsidiary of Sears Roebuck and Company, Business Outfitters CAD Operations, Dodgeville, Wisconsin (“Lands’ End”), 71 Fed. Reg. 18357 (Dep’t Labor Apr. 11, 2006) (notice of revised remand determination) has on Plaintiffs’ claim for Trade Adjustment Assistance certification; and it is further

ORDERED that the Department of Labor will specifically determine whether Plaintiffs produce an “intangible article” as contemplated in Lands’ End (see also, Former Employees of Elec. Data Sys. Corp. v. United States Sec’y of Labor, Slip Op. 06-53, 2006 Ct. Intl. Trade LEXIS 50 (CIT Apr. 17, 2006); and it is further

ORDERED that if the Department of Labor determines that Plaintiffs do not produce an “intangible article” as contemplated in Lands’ End the Department of Labor will provide the Court with a thorough and reasoned explanation for its denial; and it is further

ORDERED that the remand results shall be filed no later than July 17, 2006; and it is further

ORDERED that Plaintiffs may file papers with the Court indicating whether they are satisfied or dissatisfied with the remand results no later than August 7, 2006; and it is further

ORDERED that Defendant may respond to Plaintiffs’ comments no later than August 21, 2006.

SO ORDERED.

The Clerk of the Court is directed to forward copies of this Order to counsel for the parties.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Former Employees of Electronic Data Systems Corp. v. United States Secretary of Labor
427 F. Supp. 2d 1359 (Court of International Trade, 2006)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
30 Ct. Int'l Trade 649, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/former-employees-of-merrill-corp-v-united-states-department-of-labor-cit-2006.