Former Employees of Intex v. United States Dep't of Labor
This text of 2002 CIT 122 (Former Employees of Intex v. United States Dep't of Labor) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering United States Court of International Trade primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Slip Op. 02 - 122
UNITED STATES COURT OF INTERNATIONAL TRADE ____________________________________ : FORMER EMPLOYEES OF INTEX : : Plaintiff, : : v. : Before: MUSGRAVE, JUDGE : UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT : Court No. 01-00617 OF LABOR : : Defendant. : ____________________________________:
JUDGMENT
Upon consideration of pro se Plaintiffs’ failure to prosecute this action with due diligence
in accordance with the Scheduling Order entered by the Court on August 15, 2002, and Plaintiffs’
failure to respond to the Court’s Order to Show Cause why this action should not be dismissed, it
is hereby ORDERED that this action is dismissed for lack of prosecution pursuant to Rule 41(b)(3)
of the Rules of this Court.
________________________________________ R. KENTON MUSGRAVE, JUDGE
Dated: October 16, 2002 New York, New York
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
2002 CIT 122, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/former-employees-of-intex-v-united-states-dept-of-labor-cit-2002.