Former Employees of Henderson Sewing MacHines v. Chao

Court of International Trade

Former Employees of Henderson Sewing MacHines v. Chao

25 Ct. Int'l Trade 1308, 2001 CIT 141

CourtUnited States Court of International Trade

DecidedDecember 7, 2001

DocketCourt 01-00883

StatusPublished

This text of 25 Ct. Int'l Trade 1308 (Former Employees of Henderson Sewing MacHines v. Chao) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering United States Court of International Trade primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Former Employees of Henderson Sewing MacHines v. Chao, 25 Ct. Int'l Trade 1308, 2001 CIT 141 (cit 2001).

Pincite

Opinion

ORDER

TSOUCALAS, Senior Judge:

Upon consideration of the defendant’s consent motion for voluntary remand, it is hereby

Ordered that the consent motion is granted; and it is further

Ordered that this action is remanded to the Department of Labor to conduct a further investigation and to make a redetermination as to whether petitioners are eligible for certification for worker adjustment assistance benefits; and it is further

Ordered that remand results shall be filed no later than 60 days after the date of this order; and it is further

Ordered that the plaintiffs shall file papers with the Court indicating whether they are satisfied with the remand results no later than 30 days after the remand results are filed with the Court; and it is further

Ordered that the deadline for the filing of: (1) the answer pursuant to Rule 12(a)(1)(A); and (2) the administrative record pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2653(d)(1) and Rule 72(a), shall be extended to 30 days after the plaintiffs indicate whether they are satisfied or dissatisfied with the remand results.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI