Former Employees of Fairchild Semi-Conductor Corp. v. United States Sec'y of Labor
This text of 2008 CIT 81 (Former Employees of Fairchild Semi-Conductor Corp. v. United States Sec'y of Labor) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering United States Court of International Trade primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Slip Op. 08- 81
J U D G M E N T
UNITED STATES COURT OF INTERNATIONAL TRADE
Thomas J. Aquilino, Jr., Senior Judge
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -X FORMER EMPLOYEES OF FAIRCHILD SEMI- : CONDUCTOR CORP., : Plaintiffs, : v. Court No. 06-00215 : UNITED STATES SECRETARY OF LABOR, : Defendant. - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -X
This case having been commenced to appeal the Negative
Determinations Regarding Eligibility To Apply for Worker
Adjustment Assistance And Alternative Trade Adjustment
Assistance of the Employment and Training Administration, U.S.
Department of Labor, TA-W-58,624, 71 Fed.Reg. 14,954 (March 24,
2006); and the court in slip opinion 07-38, 31 CIT ___ (March
13, 2007), having determined to remand them to the defendant for
reconsideration on the merits; and the defendant having
published and filed a Notice of Negative Determination on
Remand, 72 Fed.Reg. 24,613 (May 3, 2007), pursuant thereto; and
the plaintiffs having continued to contest defendant’s position
with regard to certification of their eligibility for trade- Court No. 06-00215 Page 2
adjustment assistance, whereupon a hearing in open court was
held; and the court having thereafter in slip opinion 08-43, 32
CIT ___ (April 18, 2008), ordered the defendant to conduct
further investigation upon remand; and the defendant having
filed herein a Notice of Revised Determination on Remand (July
22, 2008), reporting that it has done so and certifying now that
All workers of Fairchild Semiconductor International, Mountain Top, Pennsylvania, who became totally or partially separated from employment on or after January 11, 2005, through two years from the issuance of this revised determination, are eligible to apply for Trade Adjustment Assistance under Section 223 of the Trade Act of 1974, and are eligible to apply for alternative trade adjustment assistance under Section 246 of the Trade Act of 1974;
Now therefore, after due deliberation, it is
ORDERED, ADJUDGED and DECREED that this certification
of the defendant be, and it hereby is, affirmed.
Dated: New York, New York August 4, 2008
/s/ Thomas J. Aquilino, Jr. Senior Judge
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
2008 CIT 81, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/former-employees-of-fairchild-semi-conductor-corp-v-united-states-secy-cit-2008.