Forman v. Pace Et Ux.

108 So. 170, 91 Fla. 575
CourtSupreme Court of Florida
DecidedMarch 27, 1926
StatusPublished

This text of 108 So. 170 (Forman v. Pace Et Ux.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Forman v. Pace Et Ux., 108 So. 170, 91 Fla. 575 (Fla. 1926).

Opinion

*576 Per Curiam.

— In a suit by Foreman against Adger M. Pace and Johnnie Pace to enforce a mortgage lien, L. A. Wolff and R. P. Pace were also made parties defendant.

The following stipulation was entered into: ‘ ‘ It, is hereby stipulated and agreed by counsel for the respective parties herein, to-wit: Charles Forman, complainant, and L .A. Wolff, defendant, that the facts in this suit and upon which the court shall render.its decision herein are as follows: That on the 16th day of October, A. D. 1919, Adger M. Pace one of the defendants herein procured from complainant Charles Forman a loan in the sum of $6500.00 which said sum was to be applied and paid to W. B. Bishop on account of the purchase price on the following described lands mentioned in complainant’s said bill as situate in Jefferson County, Florida, and described as follows: The North Plalf of Section Twenty; and all that portion of the East Half of the Northeast Quarter of Section Nineteen lying East of the Public Road, all of said lands being in Township One (1) South of Range Four (4) East, and containing in the aggregate 396 acres more or less; that immediately prior to said 16th day of October, 1919, the said lands were owned and held by the said W. B. Bishop; that the said W. B. Bishop at all times was actually present and was instrumental and aided and assisted the said Adger M. Pace in negotiating the said loan of $6500.00 for complainant, and was acquainted with every detail in connection with said loan; that on the said 16th day of October, 1919, the said Adger M. Pace and his wife Johnnie Pace executed to said complainant Charles Forman their promissory notes for the principal sum of $6500.00 and also their 10 interest notes as mentioned and alleged in complainant’s said bill, and on the same day and same time said Adger M. Pace and his said wife'executed and delivered to said complainant Charles Forman their deed of mortgage covering the above *577 described lands to secure tbe payment of said principal notes for the said s,um of $6500.00 and the interest thereon represented by said interest notes maturing as mentioned in complainant’s said bill in this cause; that the said mortgage was afterwards on to-wit the 25th day of October, 1919, duly filed for record and properly recorded according to law in the office of the Clerk of Circuit Court of said County of Jefferson as shown by certificate of record on said mortgage appended to the bill of complaint in this cause; that said mortgage was in all respects duly and legally executed and acknowledged by the said defendants Adger M. Pace and wife Johnnie Pace; that the proceeds from the said loan of $6500.00 was actually, and by direction of said Adger M. Pace, paid over by said complainant Charles Forman to said W. B. Bishop, and under agreement and understanding between the parties applied on the purchase price for the above described lands from said Bishop to said Adger M. Pace; that subsequently on the 30th day of October, 1919, the said W. B. Bishop joined by his wife Edna Bishop, by warranty deed conveyed to the said defendant Adger M. Pace the said 396 acres of land described, which said deed was on said 30th day of October, 1919, duly recorded in said Clerk’s Office of said County of Jefferson; that notwithstanding complainant’s said said mortgage was dated October 16th, 1919, and said loan closed on said date, and the deed conveying said lands from said W. B. Bishop and wife, was not made and recorded until October 30th, 1919, it was expressly agreed and stipulated between the said W. B. Bishop, the said Adger M. Pace and the complainant on said 16th day of October, 1919, at time of closing said loan, that said transfer of said lands -should be considered as actually made- and consummated on said 16th day of October, 1919, for alL *578 intents and purposes, and the said Adger M. Pace was let into the possession of said lands on the said 16th day of October, 1919, after he and his wife Johnnie Pace had executed and delivered to complainant their notes and mortgage above mentioned, and complainant had paid over to the said W. B .Bishop the said sum of $6500.00 represented by said loan. That on the said 30th day of October, 1919, the said Adger M. Pace being further indebted to said W. B. Bishop in the sum of $3000.00 for the remaining balance due from the purchase price for said lands, the said Adger M. Pace and his wife executed and delivered to said W. B. Bishop their other mortgage over said lands securing the payment of principal sum of $3000.00 as represented by certain notes maturing as mentioned and set out in the answer of said L. A. Wolff filed herein; which said last mentioned mortgage was duly executed' and acknowledged and subsequently, on to-wit, the 5th day of November, 1919, duly recorded in the public records of said county of Jefferson. That it wj,s expressly understood and agreed between the said W. B. Bishop, Adger M. Pace and complainant, that complainant’s said mortgage for the principal sum of $6500.00 mentioned herein and in said bill of complaint, should be held, treated and considered as a first or prior lien or mortgage over said lands and the said mortgage for $3000.00 herein mentioned in favor of said W. B. Bishop should be held, treated and considered as inferior and subordinate to the lien of complainant's said $6500.00 mortgage, and expressly subject thereto; that in neither of said mortgages is it specified on the face thereof that said indebtedness was incurred for the purchase price for said lands; but the said sum of $6500.00 was actually paid by complainant to said W. B. Bishop as hereinbefore set forth and accepted by said W. B. Bishop as payment *579 pro tanto on account of the purchase price for said lands, and the said mortgage and notes for $3000.00 as above mentioned was executed and accepted and represented the balance due said W. B. Bishop by said Adger M. Pace for the balance due for the purchase price of said lands that the said W. B. Bishop at time of execution and acceptance by him of said mortgage for $3000.00 well knew and. had actual notice and knowledge of complainant’s said mortgage for $6500.00 and knew that same was prior thereto duly recorded in public records of said county of Jefferson. That afterwards, on the 17th day of September, 1921, the said W. B. Bishop in consideration of the sum of $800.00, sold, transferred and assigned the said notes and mortgage for $3000.00 to J. F. Hagan, but the said J. F. Hagan at the time thereof was expressly notified and advised by the said W. B. Bishop that the said $3000.00 mortgage was a second mortgage and inferior and subordinate to complainant’s first mortgage for $6500.00 above herein mentioned, and same' was accepted by said J. F. Hagan with' such notice and knowledge; that afterwards, to-wit, the 15th day of October, 1921, for value and before maturity of the notes, the said J. F. Hagan sold, assigned and transferred the said notes and mortgages for $3000.00 to one George Martin, who was not advised by the said J. F. Hagan' that same was a second mortgage and subordinate to the $6500.00 mortgage of complainant; that on the 8th day of February, 1922, and after maturity of first of said notes, and for value, the said George Martin sold, assigned and transferred said notes and mortgage for $3000.00 to one W. T.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
108 So. 170, 91 Fla. 575, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/forman-v-pace-et-ux-fla-1926.