Forman v. John Hancock Mutual Life Insurance

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Forman v. John Hancock Mutual Life Insurance

263 A.D. 955, 33 N.Y.S.2d 823, 1942 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 7582

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedFebruary 3, 1942

StatusPublished

This text of 263 A.D. 955 (Forman v. John Hancock Mutual Life Insurance) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Forman v. John Hancock Mutual Life Insurance, 263 A.D. 955, 33 N.Y.S.2d 823, 1942 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 7582 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1942).

Pincite

Opinion

Action to rescind an executed contract for the purchase

and sale of real property on the ground of fraud. Order which, among other things, denied plaintiff’s motion to strike the third separate defense from the answer, and order granting defendant’s motion to compel a reply, in so far as appeals are taken therefrom, affirmed, with one bill of ten dollars costs and disbursements. The third defense is good as a matter of pleading. It should not be presumed that the justice presiding at the trial of the action will be misled as to the effect of the orders from which the appeals are taken. Lazansky, P. J., Hagarty, Carswell, Johnston and Adel, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Action to rescind an executed contract for the purchase

and sale of real property on the ground of fraud. Order which, among other things, denied plaintiff’s motion to strike the third separate defense from the answer, and order granting defendant’s motion to compel a reply, in so far as appeals are taken therefrom, affirmed, with one bill of ten dollars costs and disbursements. The third defense is good as a matter of pleading. It should not be presumed that the justice presiding at the trial of the action will be misled as to the effect of the orders from which the appeals are taken. Lazansky, P. J., Hagarty, Carswell, Johnston and Adel, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

263 A.D. 955, 33 N.Y.S.2d 823, 1942 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 7582, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/forman-v-john-hancock-mutual-life-insurance-nyappdiv-1942.