Forman v. Forman

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Forman v. Forman

260 A.D. 878, 22 N.Y.S.2d 922, 1940 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5193

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedOctober 21, 1940

StatusPublished

This text of 260 A.D. 878 (Forman v. Forman) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Forman v. Forman, 260 A.D. 878, 22 N.Y.S.2d 922, 1940 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5193 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1940).

Pincite

Opinion

Action for a declaratory judgment. Order dated July 15, 1940, granting reargument and on reargument adhering to the original decision, reversed on the law, with ten dollars costs and disbursements, and defendant’s motion for an examination of plaintiff before trial granted, with ten dollars costs; the examination to proceed at a time and place to be fixed in the order to be entered hereon. In our opinion defendant is entitled to examine plaintiff with respect to the acts of misfeasance and nonfeasance alleged in the counterclaim. Appeal from order dated June 19, 1940, dismissed, without costs. Lazansky, P. J., Carswell, Johnston, Taylor and Close, JJ., concur. Settle order on notice.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Action for a declaratory judgment. Order dated July 15, 1940, granting reargument and on reargument adhering to the original decision, reversed on the law, with ten dollars costs and disbursements, and defendant’s motion for an examination of plaintiff before trial granted, with ten dollars costs; the examination to proceed at a time and place to be fixed in the order to be entered hereon. In our opinion defendant is entitled to examine plaintiff with respect to the acts of misfeasance and nonfeasance alleged in the counterclaim. Appeal from order dated June 19, 1940, dismissed, without costs. Lazansky, P. J., Carswell, Johnston, Taylor and Close, JJ., concur. Settle order on notice.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

260 A.D. 878, 22 N.Y.S.2d 922, 1940 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5193, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/forman-v-forman-nyappdiv-1940.