Forman v. Dearlove
This text of 276 A.D.2d 667 (Forman v. Dearlove) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, the defendant appeals from so much of an or[668]*668der of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Belen, J.), dated January 19, 2000, as denied his motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint on the ground that the plaintiff did not sustain a serious injury within the meaning of Insurance Law § 5102 (d).
Ordered that the order is affirmed insofar as appealed from, with costs.
We agree with the Supreme Court that there is an issue of fact as to whether the plaintiff sustained a serious injury within the meaning of Insurance Law § 5102 (d) (see, Livai v Amoroso, 239 AD2d 565; Walsh v Kings Plaza Replacement Serv., 239 AD2d 408). O’Brien, J. P., Sullivan, Krausman, Gold-stein and Schmidt, JJ., concur.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
276 A.D.2d 667, 717 N.Y.S.2d 883, 2000 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 10661, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/forman-v-dearlove-nyappdiv-2000.